Ned, This is a good spoof on pixel peeping, but unfortunately, many of the so called "New School photographers" are actually thinking that way. We,from the so called "Old School" are not so much worried about the number of pixels. It's always the photographer...not the camera.
I'm the President of Pentax Imaging (USA), and an avid photographer. I'm very fortunate to have a day job that combines my love of photography with leading a company in selling and marketing cameras. Prior to Pentax, I worked in product marketing and planning roles at Canon Computer Systems, Polaroid, Adobe Systems, Agfa-Gevaert and NEC. I've operated two studios over my career, most recently Bunnell Photography in San Clemente, CA .
6 Comments:
That was good!! :-D
Ned,
This is a good spoof on pixel peeping, but unfortunately, many of the so called "New School photographers" are actually thinking that way. We,from the so called "Old School" are not so much worried about the number of pixels. It's always the photographer...not the camera.
The sad thing is...that is so true (dpreview!!!!!). Scary in its accuracy.
"There's a dead pixel in my camera and I haven't found it yet."
Riiiight. And how would he know? From the smell?
HILARIOUS!!!!!!!!!
I caught this link over at a well known forum. This video is right on the mark!
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home